Is This Movie Narrative Fact Or Fiction

The Catcher Was A Spy???

Morris Berg 52/65/124/146 Mesmeriser, Pretenders, Skepticism (Org/ROrg 133/137 Its Not Real, Government)

Catcher Moe Berg 69/75/123/255 Undecipherable (69/84/123/255 Nondescribable) (69/48/123 Duplifying) (39/42/93/123 Invented) (Org/ROrg 152/226 Propagandistic (125/226 Uncertifiable)

Catcher 68/85/131 Imaginability (68/58/131 Programming) (68/113 Mainstream) (31/59/113 Bull Shit) (Org/ROrg 73/116 Shameproof, Underacting, Fictionize)

Based On A True Story 78/102/222/237 Counterequivalent, Nonexistentialism (Org/ROrg 206/253 Unauthenticalness) (206/253=62/253 Deceivableness))

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4602066/?ref_=nv_sr_3?ref_=nv_sr_3

A catcher sent in by the US government to kill a scientist. Is this TRUE STORY real or a work of fiction? When you take into account the occupation of the scientist then this story is a complete work of fiction.

Two Hairy Guys???

My Hair Is More Newsworthy Than Yours?

Boris Johnson 59/67/158/166 Doubtfulness (59/158 Controlling) (67/59/158 Freemasonry, Stage Name) (59/76/158 Uninfluential) (59/76/166 Unrealistic) (68/67/166 Programming) (59/166 Actor Agent) (59/67/166 Falsifiers) (59/67/77/166 Character) (59/67/166 Humiliation) (76/77/166 Preconceptional) (59/67/158 Woman In Suit) (Org/ROrg 162/162=162/216 Premanufacture (126/126 Deceivability) (126/216 Characterizer, Superfinanced)

Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson 307/503=370/530=74/106 Characterisation (145/152 Reinvention) (145/206 Counterfeited, Suspicionable) (145/125 Puppetries) (145/179 Disingenious, Transvestism) (154/170 Enterprising, Impersonates) (163/161 Impersonator) (215/163 Scriptitiously) (107/163 Predevised) (161/136 Trickstress) (Org/ROrg 416/394=208/197=82/197 Manufactured, Distrustingly, Corruptionist (82/179 Fraudulentness, Truthlessly)

dyed blond hair 67/77/121/230 Characterized (67/95/121/230 Parasiticidic) (67/77/211 Newsworthiness) (76/95/211 Transcriptively) (95/112/211 Hyperhilariously) (32/67/77/112 Shammer, Fumbler) (67/32/95 Forgery) (Org/ROrg 205/146 Superdubiousness, Overemphaticalness (52/146 Mesmeriser, Pretenders) (52/164 Intentional) (146/250 Underhandedness))

Boris Johnson Hair 86/94/194/238 Sensationalizing (86/103/238 Superartificial) (68/94/194 Condescensiveness) (Org/ROrg 213/219=213/192 Resurrectionist)

Donald Trump Hair 75/87/174/231 Superbelievably (69/57/123/147 Conspiracy, Divinizing) (57/78/174/150 Scripturally) (Org/ROrg 228/177=177/282 Preidentification)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOyo0mYG-Tk

Is Boris Johnson’s hair mightier than Donald Trump’s??? Not By the numbers…Trump wins!

If you believe the numbers then Boris Johnson is a carbon copy of Trump meaning that HE is a SHE dressed up as a man.

Will Nomi Bond Lure In The Movie Fans

The Name is Bond…..Nomi Bond

Lashana Lynch 46/62/118 Not Real Name (62/118/206 Purposefulness, Unauthenticalness) (26/46/62 Mockable) (55/80 Satan) (46/80 Satanical) (46/62/118 Controlled) (64/80/206 Counterfeited) (Org/ROrg 144/180 Nonauthentic (81/144 Sportswriting, Purpose Plan)

Nomi Bond 41/40/86/103 Conjure, Phonies, Fantasy (68/130 Misleadingly, Gullability) (Org/ROrg 90/126 Schemers, Deceivability, Improvise)

Bond Two Five 45/72/135/162 Masterminds (54/72/135/162 Subvertible) (54/54/135/162 Outlaughing) (54/54 Mockery) (Org/ROrg161/136 Trickstress (163/161 Impersonator))

Sean Connery 52/65/133/164 This is A Hoax (61/65/160/164 Exploitation, Immortalizes) (74/106/164/268 Characterisation) (Org/ROrg 134/163 Moonwalking (136/134 Awlessness))

Pierce Brosnan 67/86/139/212 Idioticalness (76/95/193/212 Improvisational) (67/77/139/212 Thinkableness) (Org/ROrg 176/175 Conspiratress (167/157 Conspirators)

Daniel Craig 79/83/142 Characterizing (56/79/214 Characterise) (83/79/214 Hypersuggestibly) (Org/ROrg 121/176 Contrivable)

The 25^th Bond Movie will feature a woman playing a female super secret agent and she’s black. Will she be a hit at the box office or will she flop??? She has SATAN’s numbers coded into her stage name so that her employers will make every efforts to make her a success. The fans that pay to see a female Bond kick butts and get her guys or gals in bed will make the movie a hit or miss.

Lashana Lynch doesn’t have the numbers as with her predeceessors so she may be a ONE HIT WONDER or she may surprise the male audiences. It’s quite a change for the Bond Franchise and they are willing to gamble with a female Bond character hoping to for that BOX OFFICE success and money.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7264887/First-black-James-Bond-girl-blasts-casting-actress-Lashana-Lynch-taking-007.html

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2736476/?ref_=nv_sr_1?ref_=nv_sr_1

BigFoot Exist In The Movies

Missing Link...Sasquatch Made Real!!!

Sasquatch 46/53/109/134 Mockingly, Actorship, Imposters, Puppetize (46/53/109 Trickery, Bamboozler) (62/73/134/190 Programmatic) (53/73/190 Farcicality) (62/190 Fictitiousness) (46/62/143 Misdirect, Preprogram) (28/53/143 Falseness) (53/73/143 Contrivances, Manipulative) (Org/ROrg 68/175 Deceitfully, Journalising, Staged Event, Misinformation, Unfathomableness (68/157 Scriptorial, Prepostorship) (86/157 Falsifies, Misleader, Mainstream))

Bigfoot 38/43/74/115 Misname, Masonic, Baloney (38/43/115 Bodyless) (43/74/151 Jesus Christ) (Org/ROrg 86/103 Nonphotographically, Conjure, Phonies, Theatrics (68/103 Bull Shit, Manipulatability) (68/130 Misleadingly, Gullability) (86/130 Preconceivable))

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6348138/?ref_=nv_sr_2?ref_=nv_sr_2

Is the famous Sasquatch real or a fabrication. You should know the answer without the numbers but if you are unsure then the numbers makes it clear that Bigfoot is a hoax dream’t up by the mainstream medias or someone’s twisted imagination.

Bigfoot is features in the movie MISSING LINK which is very amusing and has a funny storyline. The animation is STOP MOTION so they built the settings where the characters play out their narratives. The movie is very entertaining so if you’ve never seen a STOP MOTION animation movie then this one will make you laugh and giggle.

101 Or IOI.....Fight!!

Ready Player One

The bad guys in this movie are from a company called Innovative Online Industries (IOI) which looks similar to 101 the 26^th prime number. They and the good guys are hunting for three keys that will unlock the secret to finding a fortune. Don’t want to give away the story but it has a great narrative with lots of stellar CGI’s and great characters.

The 101 or IOI is central to the plot and I ask myself is it 101 that is interpreted in the movie or is it IOI--- Innovative Online Industries. Watch The movie and use your own judgment. It well worth your time.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1677720/?ref_=nv_sr_2?ref_=nv_sr_2

Could It Be....Could It Be....Could It BEEEEEEEEEEE???

Could It Be???

No….it not a parody song of the Beatles LET IT BE but you may be at risk of health concerns if you don’t think that it could be. What am I blogging about??? WIFI or Wireless Network.

As I am writing out this blog...my eyes are getting itchy and they are getting tired but not light sensitive like some people. Different people will experience different symptoms…..so I wondered If it could be the WIFI that you are using on your computer and not the computer itself that is the source of what’s effecting your health.

The only way to find out is to ditch the wireless connection and go wired. It would be your solution to your problem whatever it mat be!

Stop Worrying....Nuclear Bombs Are Non-Existence

Dr. Strangelove Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb

NUCLEAR WARHEAD 62/73/134/190 Programmatic (82/134/217 Fictioneering, Inconceivably) (28/62/134 Awlessness) (28/62/100/143 Falseness) (62/82/143/181 Contrivances, Manipulative) (Org/ROrg 161/217 Preidentifying (116/127 Misinform) (116/172 Inconceivability, Superimprobable)

HANDLE WITH CARE 68/85/131/247 Indeterminable (86/103/130/113 Bull Shit, Operation, Dishonest) (68/67/113 Mainstream) (113/76 Not True) (86/94/247 Supercoincidently) (68/112/131 Fraudster) (Org/ROrg 178/200 Inauthenticity, Counterfeiters)

NUCLEAR WARHEAD HANDLE WITH CARE 265/491=194/265 Condescensiveness (130/194 Misleadingly, Misdirecting, Dumbfounding) (103/130/194 Orchestrations, Prepostorship, Transcriptively) (103/149 Staged Prop) (Org/ROrg 339/417=113/139 Overintellectualized, Superimprobableness, Conceptualistically (131/193 Illusionable) (131/139 Fictitiously, Ridiculous)

HI THERE 37/53/82/161 Concocted (62/64/116 Condescending) (62/64/116 Fictionize, Shameproof) (55/62/161 Counterfeit) (46/53/161 Doubtable) (89/73/161 Preidentifying) (46/53/161 Bamboozler) (Org/ROrg 99/90 Mockery, Hyperintellectually, Conspiratorially, Inconceivableness)

DEAR JOHN 60/75/141 Militarizes, Tribulation (75/51/141 Extemporize) (57/141 Superscripts) (57/51/141 Divinized) (60/75/114 Inconceivable) (75/60/114 Scripture) (Org/ROrg 115/101 Bodyless, Artfully, Overimaginativeness (151/101 Conspirative, Improvising, Unfeasibleness)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057012/?ref_=nv_sr_4?ref_=nv_sr_4

Dr Strangelove is a great movie worthy of the 8.4 rating on IMDB.com. The cast of characters are a mockery of the plot of the movie. The actors were all chosen brilliantly by the director Stanley Kubrick as well as their performances. You want to be entertained….Watch this movie.

I thought about this movie when my B-52 Bomber rendered a 113 coding and if you think the B52 Bomber is real then this movie will change your mind. The decodes above are words plastered on the two nuclear bombs. All the numbers coded into the words written on the bombs amounts to a mockery. With dual 113 decodings...this movie is as real as The Wizard Of Oz and the Hydrogen Bombs mentioned are a complete fictional entity so the movie is telling you to STOP WORRYING. I think they made this movie knowing that there’s no such weapons system that can annihilate the world. It’s all fear driven propaganda but with all of the news reports of mass extinction if the bombs were to be dropped…..anyone without the knowledge would be fearful.